Fisher et al v. Army National Guard et al
| Johanna Fisher and J. G. |
| California Military Department, California Army National Guard and Army National Guard |
| 1:2020cv01471 |
| October 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Erica P Grosjean |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
Stipulation and Order for leave to amend the complaint for Defendant California Military Department to file its response to the amended complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 12/11/2020. (First Amended Complaint due by 12/31/2020)(Rosales, O.)
|
|
Filing 13
STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Leave to File Amended Complaint & Defendant CMD's Response to Complaint by California Military Department. (Esquivel, Diana)
|
|
Filing 12
STIPULATION for 28-Day Extension for Defendant CMD to Respond to the Complaint by California Military Department. Attorney Esquivel, Diana added. (Esquivel, Diana)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER appointing Guardian Ad Litem #10 signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 11/5/2020. (Lundstrom, T)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE OF LODGING DOCUMENT(S) ELECTRONICALLY by Johanna Fisher, J. G.: REVISED NOTICE OF LODGING APPLICATION AND ORDER APPOINTING GUARDIAN AD LITEM. (Christenson, Vonn)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER CONCERNING APPOINTMENT OF GUARDIAN AD LITEM signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 10/29/2020. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED within seven days, Plaintiff's counsel shall file a motion or revised notice in connection with the appointment of a guardian ad litem that complies with Local Rule 202(c). (Gonzales, V)
|
|
Filing 8
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Christenson, Vonn)
|
|
Filing 7
CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED: Initial Scheduling Conference set for 2/2/2021 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Standing Order re Judicial Emergency, #3 Consent Form, #4 VDRP) (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing 6
SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Army National Guard* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Vonn Robert Christenson* *Christensen Law Firm* *472 W. Putnam Ave.* *Porterville, CA 93257*. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing 5
SUMMONS ISSUED as to *California Army National Guard, California Military Department* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Vonn Robert Christenson* *Christensen Law Firm* *472 W. Putnam Ave.* *Porterville, CA 93257*. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE OF LODGING DOCUMENT(S) ELECTRONICALLY by Johanna Fisher, J.G., a minor: Guardian ad Litem. (Christenson, Vonn)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Johanna Fisher, J.G., a minor. (Christenson, Vonn)
|
|
Filing 2
CIVIL COVER SHEET by Johanna Fisher, J.G., a minor (Christenson, Vonn)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS AND ADDITIONAL CLAIMS against Army National Guard, California Army National Guard, California Military Department by Johanna Fisher, J.G., a minor. Attorney Christenson, Vonn Robert added. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-9182925) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Christenson, Vonn)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
