Hendrik Block v. Michaels Stores Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Hendrik Block
Defendant: River Park Properties II and Michaels Stores Inc. Doing business as Michaels #9884
Case Number: 1:2020cv01473
Filed: October 15, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Erica P Grosjean
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 7, 2020 Filing 9 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Talia L. Delanoy on behalf of River Park Properties II. (Delanoy, Talia)
December 3, 2020 Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Blocher, Kristin)
December 3, 2020 Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant River Park Properties II. (Blocher, Kristin)
December 1, 2020 Filing 6 ANSWER by Michaels Stores Inc.. Attorney Porter, Jordan T. added.(Porter, Jordan)
November 25, 2020 Filing 5 ANSWER by River Park Properties II. Attorney Blocher, Kristin A. added.(Blocher, Kristin)
November 13, 2020 Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Michaels Stores Inc. served on 11/10/2020, answer due 12/1/2020. (Moore, Tanya)
October 16, 2020 Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED: Initial Scheduling Conference set for 2/2/2021 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Standing Order re Judicial Emergency, #3 Consent Form, #4 VDRP) (Martin-Gill, S)
October 16, 2020 Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Michaels Stores Inc., River Park Properties II* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Tanya E. Moore* *Moore Law Firm, P.C.* *300 South First St., Suite 342* *San Jose, CA 95113*. (Martin-Gill, S)
October 15, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Asserting Denial of Right of Access Under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) against All Defendants by Hendrik Block. Attorney Moore, Tanya E. added. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-9182520) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Moore, Tanya)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hendrik Block v. Michaels Stores Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: River Park Properties II
Represented By: Talia L. Delanoy
Represented By: Kristin A. Blocher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michaels Stores Inc. Doing business as Michaels #9884
Represented By: Jordan T. Porter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hendrik Block
Represented By: Tanya E. Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?