The Variable Annuity Life Insurance Company v. Dillon et al
| The Variable Annuity Life Insurance Company |
| Susan Dillon and Candida Forrester |
| 1:2020cv01542 |
| October 30, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Dale A Drozd |
| Barbara A McAuliffe |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 WAIVER of SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED: Waiver sent to Candida Forrester on 11/10/2020, Answer due 1/11/2021 (Swick, Jodi) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED: Initial Scheduling Conference set for 2/2/2021 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Standing Order re Judicial Emergency, #3 Consent Form, #4 VDRP) (Jessen, A) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Susan Dillon, Candida Forrester* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Jodi Krystyn Swick* *McDowell Hetherington, LLP* *1 Kaiser Plaza, Suite 340* *Oakland, CA 94612*. (Jessen, A) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Plaintiff The Variable Annuity Life Insurance Company. (Swick, Jodi) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT in Interpleader against Susan Dillon, Candida Forrester by The Variable Annuity Life Insurance Company. Attorney Swick, Jodi Krystyn added. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-9215299) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Swick, Jodi) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
