(PC) Argel v. Godwin et al
Plaintiff: John William Argel
Defendant: Ron Godwin and Scott Frauenheim
Case Number: 1:2021cv00597
Filed: April 9, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Barbara A McAuliffe
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MOTION to APPOINT COUNSEL by John William Argel. (Flores, E)
June 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER DENYING #7 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 06/07/2021. (Flores, E)
June 7, 2021 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #8 Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel served on John William Argel. (Flores, E)
June 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION to APPOINT COUNSEL by John William Argel. (Flores, E)
April 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Rivera, O)
April 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 STANDING ORDER AND CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE. This case has been assigned to UnassignedDJ and Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. The new case number is: 1:21-cv-00597-NONE-BAM (PC). (Rivera, O)
April 22, 2021 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case served on John William Argel. (Rivera, O)
April 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 04/12/2021. (Attachments: #1 IFP Motion) (Maldonado, C)
April 12, 2021 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis served on John William Argel. (Maldonado, C)
April 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Plaintiff's Consent or Decline due by 5/13/2021. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Maldonado, C)
April 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by John William Argel. (Maldonado, C)
April 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 (1983) PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Scott Frauenheim, Ron Godwin by John William Argel.(Maldonado, C)
April 9, 2021 Opinion or Order SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on John William Argel. (Maldonado, C)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (PC) Argel v. Godwin et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ron Godwin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Scott Frauenheim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John William Argel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?