Morales v. City of McFarland, et al.
| Miguel Angel Morales |
| City of McFarland and Christopher Rivera |
| 1:2021cv00995 |
| June 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Dale A Drozd |
| Jennifer L Thurston |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CLERK's NOTICE for Attorney, Haytham Faraj to submit a Petition for Admission to Practice in the Eastern District of California. (Lundstrom, T) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Notice - Other served on Haytham Faraj NACED. (Lundstrom, T) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 9/21/2021 at 08:30 AM in Bakersfield, 510 19th Street before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Worksheet, #3 Standing Order re Judicial Emergency, #4 Consent Form, #5 VDRP) (Lundstrom, T) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *City of McFarland, Christopher Rivera* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Tomik Vertanous* *Martinian and Associates* *2801 Cahuenga Blvd. West* *Los Angeles, CA 90068*. (Lundstrom, T) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Miguel Angel Morales. Attorney Vertanous, Tomik added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0972-9666192) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Vertanous, Tomik) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
