Moore v. Covenant Living West
Plaintiff: John Moore
Defendant: Covenant Living West Doing business as Brandel Manor
Case Number: 1:2021cv01303
Filed: August 27, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Sheila K Oberto
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 247
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 REQUEST for JUDICIAL NOTICE by Covenant Living West in re #15 Opposition to Motion. (Kanno, Rita)
October 6, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 OPPOSITION by Covenant Living West to #12 Motion to Remand,. (Kanno, Rita)
October 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 STANDING ORDER signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/5/2021in Light of Judicial Emergency in the Eastern District of California. (Lundstrom, T)
October 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 REPLY by Covenant Living West to RESPONSE to #6 Motion to Dismiss. (Kanno, Rita)
September 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 AMENDED MOTION to REMAND amending #10 Motion to Remand, and Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss by John Moore. Motion Hearing set for 10/20/2021 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit)(Smith, Dawn)
September 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 OPPOSITION by Covenant Living West to #10 Motion to Remand,. (Kanno, Rita)
September 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MOTION to REMAND and Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss by John Moore. Motion Hearing set for 10/20/2021 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit)(Smith, Dawn)
September 7, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER (Text Only Entry) The parties are informed that pursuant to Local Rule 302 and the Standing Order Re Judicial Emergency [4-2], the recently-filed motion to dismiss #6 will be heard and decided by the undersigned. No hearing will be calendared, and the matter will be decided on the papers. The hearing date chosen by the filing party serves only to set the opposition and reply filing deadlines. A written decision will issue as soon as is practicable in light of the Court's extraordinarily heavy caseload signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on September 7, 2021. (Munoz, I)
September 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 REQUEST for JUDICIAL NOTICE by Covenant Living West in re #6 Motion to Dismiss. (Kanno, Rita)
September 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 PROPOSED ORDER re Granting Defendant's Motion to Dismiss re #6 Motion to Dismiss. (Kanno, Rita)
September 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MOTION to DISMISS by Covenant Living West. Motion Hearing set for 10/20/2021 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. (Kanno, Rita)
September 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Kanno, Rita)
August 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED: Initial Scheduling Conference set for 12/2/2021 at 09:45 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Standing Order re Judicial Emergency, #3 Consent Form, #4 VDRP) (Jessen, A)
August 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Covenant Living West: Amended #1 Notice of Removal,,. (Kanno, Rita)
August 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Covenant Living West: Amended #1 Notice of Removal,,. (Kanno, Rita)
August 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Stanislaus Superior Court, case number CV-21-003934 by All Plaintiffs. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-9789626) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Documents, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Supplement Certificate of Serve Re Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Supplement Defendant's Notice to Adverse Party of Removal of Action to Federal Court, #5 Supplement Defendant's Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Removal of Action to Federal Court, #6 Exhibit 1 to 10 in Support of Request for Judicial Notice, #7 Exhibit 11 to 25 in Support of Request for Judicial Notice, #8 Exhibit 26 to 34 in Support of Request for Judicial Notice)(Kanno, Rita)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moore v. Covenant Living West
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Moore
Represented By: Dawn M. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Covenant Living West Doing business as Brandel Manor
Represented By: Rita Rebecca Kanno
Represented By: Kathleen M. Walker
Represented By: Lann Gottesman McIntyre
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?