(PC) Thomas v. Kern Valley State Prison et al
| Richard Lee Thomas |
| Kern Valley State Prison, CDCR, People of the State of California, Sandovn, Bertha, J. Larez, Maendrez, J. Gurrez, Pita, Peralta and Betanhurt |
| 1:2021cv01675 |
| November 19, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sheila K Oberto |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Jessen, A)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER GRANTING #4 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 11/29/2021. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application) (Flores, E)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #10 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis served on Richard Lee Thomas. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing 9
PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Richard Lee Thomas. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing 8
CLERKS NOTICE: The Clerk of Court is in receipt of a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is DIRECTED to submit a Certified Prison Trust account statement for Richard Lee Thomas, CDC BF-7339 to the Clerks Office within 72 business hours of this notification. The Prison Trust Account statement must reflect the activity for the last six months. Please email the certified prison trust account statement in pdf format to FilingsFresno@caed.uscourts.gov with the case number in the subject line as reflected on this notification. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing 7
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 12/23/2021. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing 6
CASE TRANSFERRED IN from District of California Central; Case Number 5:21-cv-01913.
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER ORDER TRANSFERRING ACTION TO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA by Judge Cormac J. Carney. (see document for further details). Original file, certified copy of the transfer order and docket sheet sent electronically. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (hr) [Transferred from cacd on 11/19/2021.]
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #7 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Richard Lee Thomas. (Sant Agata, S)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and referred to Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (ghap) [Transferred from cacd on 11/19/2021.]
|
|
Filing 4
APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by a Prisoner, filed by plaintiff Richard Lee Thomas. (ghap) [Transferred from cacd on 11/19/2021.]
|
|
Filing 2
ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendants Richard Lee Thomas. (ghap) [Transferred from cacd on 11/19/2021.]
|
|
Filing 1
CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants Bertha, Betanhurt, CDCR, J. Gurrez, Kern Valley State Prison, J. Larez, Maendrez, People of The State of California, Peralta, Pita, Sandovn pursuant to 42:1983. Case assigned to Judge Cormac J. Carney and referred to Magistrate Judge John D. Eartly., filed by plaintiff Richard Lee Thomas. (ghap) [Transferred from cacd on 11/19/2021.]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
