In re: Grand Jury Subpoena 2021R00576/2021B-20-00030
3Rd Party Plaintiff: California Department of Child Support Services
Case Number: 1:2021mc00101
Filed: October 15, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Anthony W Ishii
Nature of Suit: Mandamus & Other
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 15, 2021 Filing 1 MOTION to QUASH Third Party California Department of Child Support Services' Notice of Motion and Motion to Quash Subpoena; Memorandum of Points and Authorities by California Department of Child Support Services. Attorney Grainger, Katherine Jean added. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Proof of Service Proof of Service)(Grainger, Katherine)
October 15, 2021 PAYMENT for miscellaneous case filing fee in the amount of $ 49, receipt number ACAEDC-9875981. (Grainger, Katherine)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In re: Grand Jury Subpoena 2021R00576/2021B-20-00030
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
3rd party plaintiff: California Department of Child Support Services
Represented By: Katherine Jean Grainger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?