Baltimore Aircoil Company, Inc. v. Solitaire Overseas
Plaintiff: Baltimore Aircoil Company, Inc.
Defendant: Solitaire Overseas
Case Number: 1:2022cv00952
Filed: July 29, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Presiding Judge: Ana de Alba
Referring Judge: Dale A Drozd
2 Judge: Barbara A McAuliffe
Nature of Suit: Contract Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE by Chief Judge Kimberly J. Mueller: Due to the appointment of *District Judge Ana de Alba* to the bench of the Eastern District of California, this action is reassigned from *District Judge Dale A. Drozd* to District Judge Ana de Alba for all further proceedings. (Apodaca, P)
August 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER GRANTING #6 Application for Pro Hac Vice, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 8/4/2022. Added attorney George O. Richardson, III, PHV for Baltimore Aircoil Company, Inc.. The Pro Hac Vice attorney is directed to request electronic filing access through PACER. (Marrujo, C)
August 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by Baltimore Aircoil Company, Inc. for attorney George O. Richardson III to appear Pro Hac Vice. (Filing fee $ 225, receipt number ACAEDC-10363131) (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Certificate of Good Standing)(Smith, Shane)
August 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED: Initial Scheduling Conference set for 11/8/2022 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Lawrence, A)
August 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Solitaire Overseas* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Shane Garrett Smith* *McCormick Barstow LLP* *7647 N. Fresno Street* *Fresno, CA 93720*. (Lawrence, A)
July 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Plaintiff Baltimore Aircoil Company. (Smith, Shane)
July 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Baltimore Aircoil Company (Smith, Shane)
July 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Solitaire Overseas by Baltimore Aircoil Company. Attorney Smith, Shane Garrett added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10355356) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit)(Smith, Shane)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Baltimore Aircoil Company, Inc. v. Solitaire Overseas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Baltimore Aircoil Company, Inc.
Represented By: Shane Garrett Smith
Represented By: Benjamin Thomas Nicholson
Represented By: George O. Richardson, III, PHV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Solitaire Overseas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?