(SS) Morrison v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Terry Allen Morrison |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2022cv01559 |
| December 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sheila K Oberto |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 402 Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
CONSENT MINUTE ORDER (Text Only) signed by Chief Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 12/22/2022, Nunc Pro Tunc 12/21/2022: All parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge for all further proceedings in this action, including trial and entry of judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(1). Accordingly, this Court AUTHORIZES the action to proceed before the assigned United States Magistrate Judge for all further proceedings including trial and entry of judgment. All further papers filed in this action shall bear the case number 1:22-cv-01559-SKO (SS).(Kusamura, W)
|
| Filing 10 DESIGNATION of COUNSEL FOR SERVICE. Added attorney Franco Becia for Commissioner of Social Security, attorney Social Security Admin- SS E-Service and US Attorney's Office- SS E-Service terminated (Becia, Franco) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Becia, Franco) |
| Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF ELECTRONIC SERVICE: In accordance with the Social Security Scheduling Order in effect for cases filed on or after June 15, 2021, Defendant Commissioner of Social Security hereby acknowledges electronic service of the complaint through the Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel's designated email address on 12/9/2022. (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) (Social Security Admin- SS E-Service, ) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Pena, Jonathan) |
| Filing 6 DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: #4 Summons, #5 Social Security New Case Documents for MJ as Presider, #3 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis, #1 Social Security Complaint served on Social Security Admin & US Attorney's Office. (Marrujo, C) |
|
Filing 5
SCHEDULING ORDER and ORDER RE CONSENT in SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL. Consent or Decline due by 3/9/2023. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 Consent Form) (Marrujo, C)
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Commissioner of Social Security* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Jonathan Omar Pena* *Pena & Bromberg, Attorneys at Law* *2440 Tulare St., Suite 320* *Fresno, CA 93721*. (Marrujo, C) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 12/6/2022. (Marrujo, C)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Terry Allen Morrison. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Pena, Jonathan) |
| Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security by Terry Allen Morrison. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Pena, Jonathan) |
| APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Court Action Required. (Maldonado, C) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
