Diaz v. City of Merced et al
| Armando Diaz |
| City of Merced, Cody McComb, Nicolas Dejon and Dominic Saelee |
| 1:2023cv00065 |
| January 12, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sheila K Oberto |
| Jennifer L Thurston |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 WAIVER of SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED: Waiver sent to All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Executed Waiver of Service, #2 Executed Waiver of Service, #3 Executed Waiver of Service)(Schmidt, William) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 5/16/2023 at 09:45 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Martin-Gill, S) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *City of Merced, Nicolas Dejon, Cody McComb, Dominic Saelee* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *William L. Schmidt* *William L. Schmidt, Attorney at Law, P.C.* *P.O. Box 25001* *Fresno, CA 93729*. (Martin-Gill, S) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES against All Defendants by Armando Diaz. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Schmidt, William) |
| PAYMENT for Civil Case filing fee in the amount of $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10641621. (Schmidt, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
