(SS) Flores v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Beatriz Flores |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 1:2024cv01330 |
| October 30, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Stanley A Boone |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 402 Social Security Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER RE STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE ELECTRONIC CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD AS THE ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 12/20/2024. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's response to Plaintiff's complaint shall be filed on or before January 29, 2025. All remaining deadlines as set forth in the scheduling order (ECF No. #5 ) shall be modified accordingly. (Nguyen, J)
|
| Filing 10 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Social Security Complaint by Commissioner of Social Security. (Martin, Justin) |
|
Filing 9
CONSENT MINUTE ORDER (Text Only) signed by Chief Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/8/2024: All parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge for all further proceedings in this action, including trial and entry of judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(1). Accordingly, this Court AUTHORIZES the action to proceed before the assigned United States Magistrate Judge for all further proceedings including trial and entry of judgment. All further papers filed in this action shall bear the case number 1:24-cv-01330-SAB (SS).. (Xiong, J.)
|
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Martin, Justin) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Pena, Jonathan) |
| Filing 6 DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: #3 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis, #4 Summons, #5 Social Security New Case Documents for MJ as Presider, #1 Social Security Complaint served on US Attorney's Office and Social Security Admin. (Marrujo, C) |
|
Filing 5
SCHEDULING ORDER and ORDER RE CONSENT in SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL. Consent or Decline due by 2/3/2025. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 Consent Form) (Marrujo, C)
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Commissioner of Social Security* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Jonathan Omar Pena* *Pena and Bromberg, PC* *3467 W. Shaw Ave., Suite 100* *Fresno, CA 93711*. (Marrujo, C) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Directing Clerk of Court to Issue Summons and Serve Defendant Under E-Service Program, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/31/2024. (Marrujo, C)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Beatriz Flores. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Pena, Jonathan) |
| Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security by Beatriz Flores. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Pena, Jonathan) |
| APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Court Action Required. (Flores, E) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
