Enriquez v. City of Bakersfield, et al.
| Roberto Enriquez, Jr. |
| City of Bakersfield, Marc TaFoya, Colin Newhouse and Andrew Nabors |
| 1:2024cv01588 |
| December 26, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Christopher D Baker |
| Jennifer L Thurston |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 ANSWER with Jury Demand by City of Bakersfield. Attorney Marderosian, Michael G. added.(Marderosian, Michael) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: All Defendants. (Lagos, Panos) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 3/26/2025 at 09:30 AM in Bakersfield (CDB) before Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker. (Attachments: #1 CDB Worksheet, #2 Standing Order, #3 Consent Form, #4 VDRP) (Lundstrom, T) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *City of Bakersfield, Andrew Nabors, Colin Newhouse, Marc TaFoya* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Panos Lagos* *Law Offices of Panos Lagos* *6569 Glen Oaks Way* *Oakland, CA 94611*. (Lundstrom, T) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Damages, Declaratory and Injunctive Relief, and Demand for Jury Trial against All Defendants by Roberto Enriquez, Jr. Attorney Lagos, Panos added. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACAEDC-11944718) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Lagos, Panos) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
