Whaley v. Safeco Insurance Company of America, a New Hampshire corporation et al
| Tamara Whaley |
| Safeco Insurance Company of America and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company |
| 1:2025cv00148 |
| February 5, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sheila K Oberto |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 5/13/2025 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A(m), #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Deputy Clerk SSA) |
| RECEIPT number ACAEDC-12023628 for $405.00 for Civil Filing Fee from Nicholas J. Boos. (Deputy Clerk JPX) |
| Filing 3 JURY DEMAND by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a Massachusetts corporation, Safeco Insurance Company of America, a New Hampshire corporation. (Boos, Nicholas) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a Massachusetts corporation, Safeco Insurance Company of America, a New Hampshire corporation. (Boos, Nicholas) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Madera County Court, case number MCV093700 by Tamara Whaley. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Interested Parties)(Boos, Nicholas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
