S.G. v. Tehachapi Unified School District et al
| S.G. |
| Tehachapi Unified School District, Francis M. Lynch, Kendra Bailey and Elizabeth Spoden |
| 1:2025cv00233 |
| February 21, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Christopher D Baker |
| Kirk E Sherriff |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 STIPULATION To Extend Time To Respond by Kendra Bailey, Francis M. Lynch, Elizabeth Spoden, Tehachapi Unified School District. Attorney Herr, Leonard Charles added. (Herr, Leonard) |
| Filing 14 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Kendra Bailey served on 3/29/2025, answer due 4/21/2025. (Rivera, Anna) |
| Filing 13 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Elizabeth Spoden served on 3/24/2025, answer due 4/14/2025. (Rivera, Anna) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Francis M. Lynch served on 3/19/2025, answer due 4/9/2025. (Rivera, Anna) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Tehachapi Unified School District served on 3/19/2025, answer due 4/9/2025. (Rivera, Anna) |
Filing 10
ORDER GRANTING #9 Renewed Ex Parte Application for Application for Appointment of Guardian Ad Litem of Minor S.G., signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker on 03/11/2025. (Deputy Clerk CM)
|
| Filing 9 EX PARTE APPLICATION by S.G. for Appointment of Guardian ad litem. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Sheila Rosario Flores Gutierrez in support of Ex Parte Petition, #2 Declaration of Anna Rivera in support of Ex Parte Petition, #3 Proposed Order Granting Ex Parte Petition)(Rivera, Anna) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER DENYING #2 Ex Parte Application for Appointment of Guardian Ad Litem of Minor S.G. signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker on 02/25/2025. 14-Day Deadline. (Deputy Clerk CRB)
|
| Filing 7 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by S.G.. (Barajas, Maronel) |
| Filing 6 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 5/21/2025 at 09:30 AM in Bakersfield (CDB) before Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker. (Attachments: #1 CDB Worksheet, #2 Standing Order, #3 Consent Form, #4 VDRP) (Deputy Clerk SSA) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Elizabeth Spoden, Tehachapi Unified School District* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Maronel Barajas* *1440 N. Harbor Blvd.* *Suite 900* *Fullerton, CA 92835*. (Deputy Clerk SSA) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Kendra Bailey, Francis M. Lynch* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Maronel Barajas* *1440 N. Harbor Blvd.* *Suite 900* *Fullerton, CA 92835*. (Deputy Clerk SSA) |
| Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE to Attorney Maronel Barajas re #1 Complaint: Under Local Rule 200, every complaint, amended complaint, or other document initiating a civil action shall be accompanied by a completed civil cover sheet, on a form available from the Clerk and on the Court's website. Please file your civil cover sheet. If you need assistance, please contact the CM/ECF help desk at 866-884-5444. (Deputy Clerk EF) |
| Filing 2 EX PARTE APPLICATION by Tehachapi Unified School District for Appointment of Guardian ad litem. (Barajas, Maronel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Tehachapi Unified School District. Attorney Barajas, Maronel added. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACAEDC-12054246) (Barajas, Maronel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
