USA v. Heath, et al
| USA |
| Daniel G Heath, John P Heath and Mary C Heath |
| Mary C Heath, John P Heath and Daniel G Heath |
| USA |
| 2:1990cv01585 |
| October 20, 2009 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Edward J. Garcia |
| John F. Moulds |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 Recovery of Debt to US |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
112
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Edward J. Garcia on 1/3/2011 CASE DISMISSED with PREJUDICE 111 pursuant to FRCP 41(a), each party shall bear its own costs and fees incurred in this litigation. CASE CLOSED (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
103
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 5/6/10: Settlement Conference set for 7/1/2010 at 01:30 PM before Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
97
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Edward J. Garcia on 10/15/2009 ORDERING that 85 Motion to reopen stayed case and for entry of judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; the case is re-opened; entry of judgment is DENIED; parties shall meet and confer concerning status conference or evidentiary hearing dates. (Suttles, J)
|
|
Filing
88
STIPULATION and ORDER 86 signed by Senior Judge Edward J. Garcia on 8/13/2009 ORDERING 85 Motion to Reopen case and for Entry of Judgment: Motion Hearing reset for 10/16/2009 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (EJG) before Senior Judge Edward J. Garcia. (Reader, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
