Eichler v. Sherbin, et al
Case Number: 2:2004cv01108
Filed: June 9, 2004
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Prisoner: Civil Rights Office
Presiding Judge: Garland E. Burrell
Presiding Judge: John F. Moulds
Nature of Suit: Both
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 302 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 02/22/12 ORDERING that plaintiff's 05/20/11 request for appointment of an expert is denied. Also, RECOMMENDING that plaintiff's 05/20/11 Rule 56(d) request be denied. Mercy's 02/25/11 motion for summary judgment be granted. Plaintiff's 04/25/11 cross-motion for summary judgment be denied; and the district court decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's sole state law claim, for medical malpractice, against defendant Nugent. Motions 223 and 242 referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
January 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 301 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 1/18/12 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations filed December 14, 2011, are adopted in full; and Plaintiff's July 6, 2011 motion for preliminary injunction is denied.(Becknal, R)
December 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 298 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 12/14/2011 DENYING plaintiff's 7/19/2011 276 Request for Certification of Interlocutory Appeal and 10/25/2011 292 Motion for Partial Entry of Final Judgment. (Marciel, M)
September 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 291 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 9/27/2011 ORDERING that Plaintiff's 287 August 17, 2011 motion for extension of time is DENIED. The 283 findings and recommendations filed August 8, 2011, are adopted in full. The January 14, 2011 motion of defendants Sherburn and Lebeck for summary judgment is GRANTED. (Duong, D)
August 9, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 283 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 08/18/11 recommending that the 1/14/11 motion fo defendants Sherburn and Lebeck for summary judgment be granted. Motion for Summary Judgment 209 referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
June 21, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 260 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 6/20/11 ORDERING that 250 Motion to Stay is DENIED; Defendants Lebeck and Sherbin are granted 10 days from the date of this order in which to file a reply to plaintiffs 3/1/11 opposition to their 1 /14/11 motion for summary judgment. That part of this courts 5/2/11 order which denied without prejudice plaintiffs cross- motion for summary judgment against defendant Mercy Hospital is VACATED. Defendant Mercy Hospital is granted 21 days from the date of this order in which to file a response to said motion. Plaintiff's 255 Motion for leave to file a supplemental opposition to defendant Mercy Hospitals motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. Plaintiffs 256 supplemental opposition t o Mercy Hospitals motion for summary judgment will be considered. Mercy Hospital is granted 10 days from the date of this order in which to file a supplemental reply. Plaintiff is granted 30 days to file and serve an opposition to defendant Gary Nugents 5/31/11 motion to dismiss. Defendant Nugents reply brief shall be filed and served within 14 days thereafter. (Dillon, M)
May 2, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 247 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 4/29/11 ORDERING that Plaintiff is granted until 5/27/11 to file and serve a further opposition to defendant Lebeck and Sherbins motion for summary judgment, said opposition to be filed by counsel fo r plaintiff; Defendants Lebeck and Sherbins reply brief, if any, shall be filed and served on or before 6/3/11; Defendants Lebeck and Sherbins 238 motion for oral argument is GRANTED; The motion of defendants Lebeck and Sherbin for summary judgment is set for oral argument on this courts regular law and motion calendar on 6/9/11 at 11:00 a.m.; Plaintiffs opposition to defendant Mercy Hospitals motion for summary judgment shall be filed and served on or before 5/20/11; Mercy Hospitals reply brief shall be filed and served on or before 5/27/11; Plaintiffs 241 motion for extension of time is DENIED; and Plaintiffs 242 cross-motion for summary judgment and request for extension of time is DENIED.(Dillon, M)
March 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 236 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 03/24/11 ordering plaintiff's 10/19/10 motions 202 , 203 are denied. Plaintiff's 03/01/11 motion for an extension of time for his court-appointed attorney to review this action 226 is g ranted. The 03/04/11 motion of defendant Lebeck and Sherbin for a stay 229 is granted. Within 30 days from the date of this order, counsel for plaintiff shall inform the court within 30 days whether he intends to rest on the pro se opposition to d efendant Lebeck and Sherbin's motion for summary judgment or whether he intends to file a further opposition to that motion. Within 30 days from the date of this order, counsel for plaintiff and counsel for Mercy Hospital shall confer and submit to the court a proposed briefing schedule for Mercy Hospital's motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff's 03/14/11 motions for extension of time 233 , 234 are denied. (Plummer, M)
March 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 235 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/22/11 ORDERING pltf's motions for reconsideration 220 222 are DENIED. (Carlos, K)
February 10, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 217 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 02/09/11 ordering Glenn Peterson is appointed counsel in the above entitled matter and should contact Sujean Park at (916)930-4278 or spark@caed.uscourts.gov if he has any questions releated to the appointment. The clerk of the court is directed to serve a copy of this order upon Glenn Peterson, Millstone, Peterson & Watts, LLP, 2267 Lava Ridge Court, Suite 210, Roseville, California, 95661. (Plummer, M)
January 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 212 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 1/27/2011 ORDERING that this matter will not be set for mediation at this time; pltf's 193 motion to amend is GRANTED as to pltf's motion to substitute Dr. Gary Nugent in place of Doe dft named in pltf's state law medical malpractice and negligence claims raised in the third amended cmplt and DENIED in all other respects; w/in 10 days, counsel for Mercy Hospital shall inform the court in writing whether counsel will accept servi ce of process for Dr. Nugent; pltf's 194 motion for appointment of an expert witness is DENIED w/out prejudice and the clerk to serve a copy of this order on the Pro Bono Coordinator for this court; pltf's 195 motion for an extension of time is DENIED; pltf's 201 motion to compel is DENIED; pltf's 204 motion for leave to file a supplemental brief is DENIED w/out prejudice; and w/in 15 days, counsel for dfts Lebeck and Sherbin shall file jointly w/ counsel for dft Mercy a response to pltf's 10/19/10 motions for tro and/or preliminary injunction. (cc: Pro Bono Coordinator)(Yin, K)
July 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 179 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 07/01/10 ordering that within 15 days from the date of this order, all parties shall file a brief addressing whether the court should exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's state law claims. (Plummer, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Eichler v. Sherbin, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?