Adkins v. Carey et al
| 2:2005cv01501 |
| July 26, 2005 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Ralph R. Beistline |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Charlene H. Sorrentino on 2/10/11, RECOMMENDING that petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be denied. Matter referred to Judge Mendez. Within 21 days after being served with these f&r's, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Any reply to the objections shall be served and filed within seven days after service of the objections. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Charlene H. Sorrentino on 01/27/11 VACATING 24 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. New findings and recommendations will issue.(Williams, D)
|
|
Filing
24
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Charlene H. Sorrentino on 7/28/10 RECOMMENDING that the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be DENIED. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections to F&Rs due within 21 days after being served. (Owen, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Adkins v. Carey et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
