Jackson v. Runnels
Case Number: 2:2005cv01531
Filed: August 1, 2005
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge: Lawrence K. Karlton
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 187 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 04/16/09 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Objections due within 20 days. (Plummer, M)
January 28, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 179 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 01/27/09 ORDERING that Pltf's 166 request for the court's assistance in arranging oral depositions of dfts and for a copy of his deposition transcript is DENIED. Pltf's 167 mottion to amend is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to file the proposed amended complaint as a second amended complaint. Service is appropriate for dft Cismowski. The Clerk shall send Pltf one USM-285 form, one summons, and instruction sheet and one copy of the second amended complaint. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that Pltf's 169 motion to file an amended complaint be denied. Objections due within 15 days. (Engbretson, K.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jackson v. Runnels
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?