Hunt v. Rodriguez et al
| 2:2006cv00141 |
| January 13, 2006 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Morrison C. England |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
92
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 08/18/09 ORDERING plaintiff's 03/03/09 70 motion and objections; his 04/15/09 79 , request for a continuance; his 04/21/09 83 , motion for continuance an d motion to compel in response to the court's order, filed on 04/08/09 78 ; and his motion again seeking a continuance, filed on 05/01/09 86 are denied (with the objections overruled; Plaintiff's inapposite request filed on 04/15/09 82 , for the court to order defendant to comply with the court's order, filed on 01/26/09 64 is denied. Also, RECOMMENDING that defendant's motion for summary judgment, filed on 02/24/09 67 , be granted and judgment be entered for defendant. MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT 67 referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 20 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 4/8/09 ORDERING that 77 Request for clarification is construed in part as a request for extension of time, and plaintiff is GRANTED 30 days from the date of this order, to file an opposition to defendants 2/24/09, motion for summary judgment, or to make a showing that a continuance of the motion is warranted.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 1/23/09 ORDERING that pltf's 39 request for an extension of time is GRANTED, nunc pro tunc, to the extent that the 42 second amended cmplt is DEEMED TIMELY; dft's 49 request for j udicial notice of the 7/24/08 documents is DENIED; pltf's 58 request for summary judgment is STRICKEN; dft's 46 motion to dismiss is VACATED w/out prejudice, and dft is to file a motion for summary judgment pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 56 w/in 30 days.(Yin, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hunt v. Rodriguez et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
