Freeland v. Sacramento City et al
Case Number: |
2:2006cv00187 |
Filed: |
January 27, 2006 |
Court: |
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Office: |
Sacramento Office |
Presiding Judge: |
Dale A. Drozd |
Presiding Judge: |
Lawrence K. Karlton |
Nature of Suit: |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Cause of Action: |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Jury Demanded By: |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
November 9, 2010 |
Filing
212
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/08/10 ordering defendants' 11/05/10 motions 210 , 211 are granted. The parties are relieved of the obligation of filing pretrial statements absent further order of the court. Scheduling o rder dates related to pretrial conference (11/12/10) and jury trial (02/07/11) are vacated. Defense counsel for defendants Vu, Villegas, Sanchez, and Hansen and defense counsel for defendants Perez and Renzelman shall file a status report regarding the status of settlement negotiations within 30 days of the date of this order. (Plummer, M)
|
October 27, 2010 |
Filing
209
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/27/10 ORDERING that within ten days of the date of this order Plaintiff shall file a pretrial statement and any motions necessary to obtain the attendance of incarcerated witnesses at trial and shall show cause in writing why sanctions should not be imposed due to his failure to comply with the Court's prior order. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of this action.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
June 15, 2010 |
Filing
206
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/14/10 ORDERING that this case is set for a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Kendall J.Newman on 8/31/10 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom #25. Parties shall appear with full settlement authorit y. No later than 8/24/10, the parties are directed to exchange nonconfidential settlement statements. These statements shall simultaneously be delivered to the court using the following email address: kjnorders@caed.uscours.gov. Plaintiff shall either mail or deliver his settlement statement to the Clerks Office, located on the 4th Floor.(Dillon, M)
|
May 13, 2010 |
Filing
197
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 5/12/10 ORDERING that any hearing dates currently set before Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton are VACATED; Clerk of the Court shall reassign this case to the Honorable Dale A. Drozd, United States Magistrate Judge. All future documents filed in the above captioned case shall reference the following case number: No. Civ. S-06-187 DAD.(Dillon, M)
|
April 20, 2010 |
Filing
190
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 04/20/10 ordering within 21 days of the date of this order, each party shall inform the court in writing whether they wish to proceed with the settlement conference before the undersigned magistrate j udge or if they wish to proceed before a randomly-assigned magistrate judge. If the parties wish to proceed before the undersigned magistrate judge, each party shall return to the court the consent form for settlement conferences provided with this order. If the parties do not wish the undersigned magistrate judge to preside at the settlement conference, each party shall file a declaration stating he wishes to proceed before a randomly-assigned magistrate judge. The clerk of the court shall send each party the consent forms for settlement conferences. (Plummer, M)
|
January 29, 2010 |
Filing
185
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/28/2010, RECOMMENDING that 121 dfts' motion for summary judgment be granted in part and denied in part as follows: 1. Dfts' motion for summary judgment with respec t to pltf's Fourteenth Amendment inadequate medical care claims be granted; and 2. Dfts' motion for summary judgment with respect to pltf's Fourth Amendment failure to protect or failure to intercede claims be denied. Motion referred t o Judge Karlton. Within 21 days after being served with these f&R's, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Any reply to the objections shall be served and filed within seven days after service of the objections.(Kastilahn, A)
|
October 26, 2009 |
Filing
178
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/26/09 ordering defendants'05/14/09 motion to compel 114 is granted. Within 30 days of the date of service of this order plaintiff shall provide supplemental responses to defendants' se cond set requests for production of documents numbers 1 through 9 and defendants' special interrogatory number 24. Defendants' 05/14/09 and 06/19/09 requests for imposition of sanctions against plaintiff 114 and 119 are denied. Defend ants' 07/16/09 motion to bifurcate the issues of liability and damages at trial 132 is denied as premature and unnecessary. Defendants 07/16/09 motions in limine 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 and 131 are denied without prejudice to the refiling of such motions after the court issues a pretrial order. Plaintiff's motion in limine filed 09/30/09 166 is denied without prejudice to the refiling of such a motion after the court issues a pretrial order. (Plummer, M)
|
October 1, 2009 |
Filing
165
ORDER denying 157 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 09/30/09. (Plummer, M)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?