Walton v. Tuggle et al
Case Number: 2:2006cv00663
Filed: March 29, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
Presiding Judge: Frank C. Damrell
Presiding Judge: Craig M. Kellison
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 29, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Judge Craig M. Kellison on 3/28/06 ORDERING the claims of Pltfs Fuller, Smith, Gonzales, Corona, Garcia, Black, Cooper, Bernhard, Sanders, Baldon, and Walton are severed from the claims of Pltf Shirley. Pltf Shirley shall proceed as s ole Pltf in case 05cv2468 FCD CMK PC. The Clerk is directed to open separate civil actions for the other 11 pltfs, and file a copy of this order and a copy the complaint filed 12/6/05 in the new open files. The Clerk shall send each pltf an endorsed of copy of his complaint bearing his new case number. Each Pltf's Complaint 1 is DISMISSED, and the Clerk is directed to send each pltf a new form for filing a Civil Rights Action and a new IFP Application. Each pltf is GRANTED 30 days from the date of this order to file an amended complaint w/a new IFP Application.(Yin, K)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Walton v. Tuggle et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?