Miller v. High Desert State Prison et al
| 2:2006cv00947 |
| April 17, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| David F. Levi |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
76
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 2/11/09 ORDERING that pltf is GRANTED 30 days to file an opposition to dfts' 68 summary judgment motion.(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 1/15/09 ORDERING that within 15 days of the date of this order, dfts shall file briefing addressing pltf's claim that he has still not received his legal and personal property; dfts shall ad dress the Rules Violation Report which states that he is not to have access to his personal property (such as is essential to access the courts) until 2/6/09. If this matter is not resolved by this briefing, the court will order a hearing.(Carlos, K)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER, INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER to Sacramento signed by Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 4/28/06. New case number 2:06-cv-947 DFL GGH(Keeler, P)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Miller v. High Desert State Prison et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
