Microsoft Corporation v. Medvedkov et al
| 2:2006cv00949 |
| May 1, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Frank C. Damrell |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
ORDER on SHOW CAUSE HEARING signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. on 5/5/06 ORDERING that the Case is UNSEALED and Defendant Oleg Medvedkov is ORDERED to appear and show cause why the temporary orders should not remain in effect pending the trial in this action. Show Cause Hearing RESET for 6/2/2006 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (FCD) before Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr.(Donati, J)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. on 05/01/06 ORDERING 7 Ex Parte Application for TRO Enjoining Distribution of Microsoft Products, Impounding Microsoft Products and Order to Show Cause filed by Microsoft Corporation; Dfts are ordered to appear 5/5/2006 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (FCD) before Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr to show cause why TRO and Temporary Impoundment Order should not remain in effect; See order for further details.(Warren, P)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Microsoft Corporation v. Medvedkov et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
