Card v. Carey et al
| 2:2006cv01027 |
| May 11, 2006 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 9/4/2009 ORDERING 66 Since the Report filed on 9/1/2009, reveals this action has settled, this action is DISMISSED. CASE CLOSED. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 9/3/09 ORDERING that the 9/4/09 trial confirmation hearing is VACATED. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER Report of Pro Se Prisoner Early Settlement Proceeding. Case Settled following further settlement conference 9/1/09 signed by Magistrate Judge Nandor J Vadas on 9/1/09. (Masterson, G)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 2/4/08 ORDERING that defendant Nunez shall notify this court, within ten days, whether he has any objection to the dismissal of the claims against him. Should defendant fail to respond, plaintiff's request will be granted. (Anderson, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Card v. Carey et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
