Keeton v. Cox et al
2:2006cv01094 |
May 19, 2006 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Garland E. Burrell |
Kimberly J. Mueller |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 66 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K Delaney on 08/22/11 recommending that defendant's 06/23/11 motion for summary judgment 59 be granted and this action closed. MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT 59 referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 65 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/17/2011 DENYING 64 plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Reader, L) |
Filing 61 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 7/9/11 DENYING 58 Motion for Reconsideration re 53 Motion to Appoint Counsel filed by Tommy Roy Keeton. (Matson, R) |
Filing 57 ORDER denying 53 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 05/25/11. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 55 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 5/10/2011 ORDERING 52 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief is AFFIRMED. (Waggoner, D) |
Filing 52 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 04/19/11 denying 50 Motion for discovery. To the extent plaintiff seeks an extension of the 03/14/11 deadline for serving discovery requests, plaintiff's request is denied as he has not shown why his requests for discovery were not served before expiration of the deadline. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 49 ORDER denying 48 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 02/09/11. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 47 DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 1/27/11: Dispositive Motions shall be filed on or before by 8/5/2011. Discovery due by 5/13/2011. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 46 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 1/26/2011 ADOPTING 43 Findings and Recommendations in full. Dft Ramirez's 34 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. Dft Ramirez shall file his answer within 21 days. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 43 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 12/19/10 ORDERING that 40 and 42 Motion for Reconsideration are DENIED; RECOMMENDING that 34 Motion to Dismiss be denied and that defendant be directed to file an answer to the complaint within twenty-one days of the date of any order adopting this recommendation. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 21 days.(Dillon, M) |
Filing 35 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/23/2010 ORDERING that, w/in 30 days, pltf to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the 34 motion to dismiss. (Yin, K) |
Filing 31 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 02/10/10 recommending that defendants' motion to dismiss 27 be resolved as follows: Granted as to defendant Cox; Granted as to the claim that defendant Ramirez retaliated against him and filed a false disciplinary report; but denied as to the claim that defendant Ramirez used excessive force against him. MOTION to DISMISS 27 referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 26 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS 24 , in full, signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 3/31/2009. Defendants' 11 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED and defendants directed to file an Answer w/in 20 days of Order. (Marciel, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Keeton v. Cox et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.