Keeton v. Cox et al
Case Number: 2:2006cv01094
Filed: May 19, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
Presiding Judge: Garland E. Burrell
Presiding Judge: Kimberly J. Mueller
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 66 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K Delaney on 08/22/11 recommending that defendant's 06/23/11 motion for summary judgment 59 be granted and this action closed. MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT 59 referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M)
August 17, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/17/2011 DENYING 64 plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Reader, L)
July 11, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 7/9/11 DENYING 58 Motion for Reconsideration re 53 Motion to Appoint Counsel filed by Tommy Roy Keeton. (Matson, R)
May 26, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER denying 53 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 05/25/11. (Plummer, M)
May 10, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 5/10/2011 ORDERING 52 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief is AFFIRMED. (Waggoner, D)
April 20, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 04/19/11 denying 50 Motion for discovery. To the extent plaintiff seeks an extension of the 03/14/11 deadline for serving discovery requests, plaintiff's request is denied as he has not shown why his requests for discovery were not served before expiration of the deadline. (Plummer, M)
February 10, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER denying 48 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 02/09/11. (Plummer, M)
January 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 47 DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 1/27/11: Dispositive Motions shall be filed on or before by 8/5/2011. Discovery due by 5/13/2011. (Kaminski, H)
January 27, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 1/26/2011 ADOPTING 43 Findings and Recommendations in full. Dft Ramirez's 34 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. Dft Ramirez shall file his answer within 21 days. (Zignago, K.)
December 20, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 12/19/10 ORDERING that 40 and 42 Motion for Reconsideration are DENIED; RECOMMENDING that 34 Motion to Dismiss be denied and that defendant be directed to file an answer to the complaint within twenty-one days of the date of any order adopting this recommendation. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 21 days.(Dillon, M)
September 24, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/23/2010 ORDERING that, w/in 30 days, pltf to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the 34 motion to dismiss. (Yin, K)
February 11, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 31 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 02/10/10 recommending that defendants' motion to dismiss 27 be resolved as follows: Granted as to defendant Cox; Granted as to the claim that defendant Ramirez retaliated against him and filed a false disciplinary report; but denied as to the claim that defendant Ramirez used excessive force against him. MOTION to DISMISS 27 referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M)
April 1, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS 24 , in full, signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 3/31/2009. Defendants' 11 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED and defendants directed to file an Answer w/in 20 days of Order. (Marciel, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Keeton v. Cox et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?