Stewart v. Higgins et al
| 2:2006cv01333 |
| June 16, 2006 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| David F. Levi |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
60
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 2/16/10 RECOMMENDING that 57 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT be granted. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 21 days.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 11/23/09 denying without prejudice 55 motion for court assistance. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
51
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 2/4/09 RECOMMENDING that defendant Higgins 49 motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust administrative remedies be granted as to plaintiffs claims of retaliation against d efendant Higgins for incidents occurring in January of 2006 and April of 2006, and this action proceed only as to plaintiffs July 2005, claims against defendant Higgins and Tiang Trong. Motion referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 20 days.(Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stewart v. Higgins et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
