Hoyt v. Manning et al
| 2:2006cv01795 |
| August 14, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Lawrence K. Karlton |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 8/31/09 ORDERING that plaintiff's 25 February 6, 2009 filing, construed as a request for relief from judgment, is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that plaintiff's 26 February 18, 2009 mo tion for an evidentiary hearing is DENIED as moot. The court notes that it will issue no response to future filings by plaintiff in this action not authorized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. (Duong, D)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 01/27/09 ORDERING that the 18 11/20/07 Findings and Recommendations, the 20 02/25/08 Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations and the 21 Judgment are REINSTATED. This action is DISMISSED w/o prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Benson, A.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hoyt v. Manning et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
