Bumgardner et al v. Kupka et al
| 2:2006cv02205 |
| May 17, 2006 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Peter A. Nowinski |
| William B. Shubb |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
ORDER TO APPEAR FOR EXAMINATION signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/28/2010 ORDERING Robert Kupka to appear personally before this court on June 2, 2010 at 10:00 a.m. before the Honorable Edmund F. Brennan in Courtroom 24 (EFB) to answer concerning property of the judgment debtor. (Clerk served endorsed copy on claimant's attorney, J. Russell Cunningham) (Waggoner, D)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/27/10 ORDERING that the 60 , 61 Applications are DENIED without prejudice. (Owen, K)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/26/10, ORDERING that counsel's applications 57 , 58 , for orders that third parties Cynthia Kupka and Robert Kupka appear for exam in connection with the enforcement proceedings, are DENIED without prejudice to refiling with the required affidavits. (Kastilahn, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bumgardner et al v. Kupka et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
