Mathis v. Scribner
2:2006cv02733 |
December 4, 2006 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Garland E. Burrell |
Dale A. Drozd |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 32 ORDER signed by Senior Judge Justin L. Quackenbush on 4/6/10 ORDERING that Petitioner's MOTION for Reconsideration 31 is DENIED. A certificate of appealability is not issued for the reasons set forth in the court's 3/8/10 Order. The Clerk is directed to enter this order and provide copies to counsel and Petitioner. The Clerk shall provide Petitioner a copy of the Court's 3/8/10 order 27 . This case shall remain closed. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 25 MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge Justin L. Quackenbush on 1/11/2010 ORDERING Mr. Mathis' second amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus should be DENIED after the determination of the certificate of appealability issue. M r. Mathis shall file any pleading he desires solely on the issue of the certificate of appealability on or before February 11, 2010. The Clerk is directed to file this Memorandum Opinion and forward a copy to Mr. Mathis and counsel for the Respondent.(Matson, R) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Mathis v. Scribner | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.