Eichler v. Director of CDC et al
2:2006cv02894 |
December 22, 2006 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Craig M. Kellison |
David F. Levi |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 152 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 9/2/2011 RECOMMENDING that Dft Nessenson be dismissed. Dfts' 133 Motion for Summary Judgment be granted. All other pending motions be denied as moot. The Clerk be directed to enter judgment and close this file. Motions referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 151 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 9/1/11 ORDERING that Plaintiff's Request for Fix Type Error on his opposition and Cross Summary Judgment 144 is GRANTED and the corrections indicated by Plaintiff will be duly noted. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 147 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 01/18/11 DENYING 132 Motion for Reconsideration; The Magistrate Judges September 20, 2010, order is affirmed; No further motions for reconsideration of this order will be considered. (Williams, D) |
Filing 131 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 09/30/10 ordering that on 09/29/10, defendants filed a notice of the death of defendant Mark Nessenson. Pursuant to Federal Rule 25(a)(1), plaintiff has 90 days from the date of this order to file a motion for substitution. If no motion is filed within 90 days, the court will recommend dismissal of the action as to defendant Nessenson only. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 128 ORDER denying 110 Motion to Compel signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 09/17/10. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 127 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 7/28/2010 CONFIRMING this case for mediation on 8/11/2010, at 10:00 am, Courtroom #1, US District Court; as set forth in the court's previous order, both sides to attend the mediation and be prepared to discuss the case in full, and unlimited authority to negotiate and enter into a binding settlement. (Yin, K) |
Filing 124 ORDER and WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM ISSUED signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 6/15/10 ORDERING the Custodian to produce Dwayne Eichler via video conferencing at 10:00 a.m. on 8/11/10 in Courtroom 1. Custodian is ordered to notify the Court of any changes in custody and to provide new custodian with a copy of this writ. Clerk shall serve a copy of this order and writ on the Custodian. (cc: IT Dept)(Dillon, M) |
Filing 122 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 6/7/2010 ORDERING that pltf's 119 objection and motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED as moot in part. (Yin, K) |
Filing 120 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 5/28/2010 ORDERING dfts to respond to pltf's objections to deposition w/in 10 days; both parties to inform the court of the status of discovery, including the pending motion to compel, indict ing whether there remains any outstanding discovery disputes, w/in 30 days; any further discovery requests due on or before 6/28/2010; any further motions to compel discovery responses due on or before 8/27/2010; and any dispositive motions due on or before 10/25/2010. (Yin, K) |
Filing 118 ORDER adopting 113 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/31/10: 101 Defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted. Defendants Tilton, Woodford, Hickman, Terhune, Gomez, Williams, Ling and Tristan are dismissed from this action. This action will continue only against defendants Nessenson, Duckett, Stogsdill, Morris, and Sturges. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 114 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 2/2/2010 ORDERING that 103 motion for leave to propound more than 25 interroagatories is DENIED; dfts' 107 motion for an extension of time is GRANTED; and dfts' 109 motion for protective order is GRANTED. (Yin, K) |
Filing 113 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 01/27/10 recommending that the motion for judgment on the pleadings 101 be granted for failure to state a claim for supervisory liability, and that defendants Tilton, Wood ford, Hickman, Terhune, Gomez, Williams, Ling and Tristan be dismissed from this action. Defendants' Gomez and Terhune's alternative basis for granting the motion, that the claims are barred by the statute of limitations, should be denied. This action should continue only against defendants Nessenson, Duckett, Stogsdill, Morris and Sturges. MOTION for JUDGMENT on the pleadings 101 referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 20 days. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 91 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 02/17/09 recommending that plaintiff's request for injunctive relief 89 be denied. Request 89 referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 20 days. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 88 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 01/26/09 recommending that the motion to dismiss 69 be denied and that defendants Woodford, Hickman, Terhune, Gomez, Tristan and Ling be ordered to file an answer within 20 days. Motion 69 referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 20 days. (Plummer, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Eichler v. Director of CDC et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.