Jacquett v. Sisto, et al
Case Number: 2:2006cv02938
Filed: December 29, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge: David F. Levi
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 32 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge James P. Hutton on 9/7/2010 RECOMMENDING that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be denied; FURTHER RECOMMENDED that the District Court decline to issue a Certificate of Appealability; any further request for a COA must be addressed to the Court of Appeals; Objections due 14 days after being served with these F & R's. Referred 1 to Judge Robert H. Whaley. (Reader, L)
August 6, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge James P. Hutton on 8/6/10. The Court will allow, but not require, the parties to submit any additional briefing they desire in response or comment to the final decision in Hayward v. Marshall, supra. Such additional briefing should be filed with the Clerk of Court on or before 9/7/2010. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
April 20, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER signed by Chief Judge Robert H. Whaley on 4/20/09 ORDERING that the Report and RECOMMENDATION filed 3/4/09 to Order Stay Proceedings 24 is ADOPTED, is its entirety. Petitioner's Petitione for writ of habeas corpus by a person in State Cu stody is STATED. The parties are directed to file Status Certification within 30 days from the date of the final disposition of the en banc rehearing granted in Hayward v. Marshall. The District Court Executive is directed to enter this Order and forward copies to Petitioner and counsel. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
January 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge James P. Hutton on 1/30/09 ORDERING that the parties are directed to show cause on or before 2/20/09, why a temporary stay should not issue in this matter. (Engbretson, K.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jacquett v. Sisto, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?