Brown v. Marshall et al
| Tommy Ray Brown |
| G. Marshall, R. Gore, Quezada, P. Statti, D. E. Vanderville, T. McDonald, R. K. Wong, T. Felker and D. L. Runnels |
| 2:2007cv00956 |
| May 21, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Kern |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Morrison C. England |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
73
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 02/29/12 ORDERING defendants' request that confidential memoranda from plaintiff's central file, referenced as Exhibits D through J in support of defendants& #039; motion for summary judgment be reviewed by the court in camera and filed under seal 57 and 58 is granted. The clerk of the court is directed to file under seal the confidential memoranda from plaintiff's central file referenced as Exh ibits D through J in support of defendants' motion for summary judgment. Also, RECOMMENDING that defendants' motion for summary judgment 58 be granted; and this action be closed. MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT 58 referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/05/11 ordering plaintiff's motion to file his original motion to amend and origianl proposed amended petition 67 is granted. Plaintiff's original motion to amend his opposition 69 is granted. The case will proceed on plaintiff's original amended opposition 70 and 71 . within 14 days of the date of this order defendants may file a supplemental reply, if any, in support of their motion for summary judgment. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 06/14/11 ordering plaintiff's motion to amend his opposition toi defendants' motion for summary judgment 63 is granted. Defendants' motion for an extension of time to file a reply 64 is granted. Defendants shall file a reply to plaintiff's amended opposition, if any, on or before 06/24/11. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/28/2011 DENYING pltf's 49 motion to compel and for sanctions. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/21/2010 DENYING pltf's 48 motion for the appointment of counsel. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
45
DISCOVERY and SCHEDULING ORDER: signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/08/09 Discovery due by 2/5/2010. Pretrial Motions, except motions to compel discovery due by 4/30/2010. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 09/03/09 granting 41 Motion for clarification. Defendant shall file a responsive pleading in this matter within 30 days of the date of this order. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
38
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 01/28/09 RECOMMENDING that the 26 Motion to Dismiss be denied and the pltf be granted 30 days leave to file a third amended complaint presenting solely his claims relating to his 48-month security housing unit term. Motion referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Objections due within 15 days. (Manzer, C)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/23/07 DENYING 2 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days from the date of this order a properly completed in forma pauperis application. The clerk is directed to send plaintiff an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Donati, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
