Beecham et al v. City of West Sacramento, et al
Plaintiff: Karene Beecham and Karena Crankson
Defendant: City of West Sacramento and Twardosz
Case Number: 2:2007cv01115
Filed: June 7, 2007
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Civil Rights: Other Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge: John A. Mendez
Nature of Suit: Both
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1981 Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 380 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 11/16/09 ORDERING that the Court DENIES 349 dfts' motion for attorneys fees and GRANTS, in part, plfs' 338 motion for attorneys' fees. The Court hereby awards plfs the following: (1) $233,336.25 in attorneys' fees for litigation and trial; (2) $47,134.25 in attorneys' fees for Fee Related Services; and (3) $11,262.30 in out of pocket expenses for a total award of $291,732.80. (Benson, A.)
July 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 336 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 7/29/2009 DENYING plaintiffs' 301 Motion for Permanent Injunction. (Marciel, M)
April 6, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 272 STIPULATION and ORDER RE VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN CLAIMS AT TRIAL, TOLLING AGREEMENT AND RELATED MATTERS signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 04/06/09. See order for details. (Benson, A.)
February 4, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 201 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 02/04/09 GRANTING 90 Motion to Compel. IT IS ORDERED that Defendants are awarded reasonable costs associated with plaintiffs' respective failure to appear at the originally scheduled psychi atric examinations in the amout of $900 for each missed appointment for a total of $1,800. Defendants are awared reimbursement for their reasonable expenses associated with the failure of Mr. Crankson to appear at his initially scheduled and rescheduled depositions in the amount of $530.30. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the court's order to show cause, Docket No. 104 is DISCHARGED. (Streeter, J)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Beecham et al v. City of West Sacramento, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Karene Beecham
Represented By: Michael Joseph Haddad
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Karena Crankson
Represented By: Michael Joseph Haddad
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of West Sacramento
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Twardosz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?