Killingsworth v. Board of Parole Hearings et al
| Martin A. Killingsworth |
| Board of Parole Hearings and James Tilton |
| 2:2007cv01333 |
| July 9, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Solano |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Ronald S.W. Lew |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Robert S. Lasnik on 10/13/10 ORDERING the petitioner's request for a certificate of appealability is DENIED. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
17
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge John L. Weinberg on 8/25/09 Recommending that Petition for writ of habeas corpus 1 be denied. Within twenty days after being served with this Findings and Recommendations, any party may file written objections with this Court and serve a copy on all parties. These Findings and Recommendations are submitted to U.S. District Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/23/07 ORDERING that the plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee. The clerk is directed to send plaintiff a new application to proceed in forma pauperis.(Donati, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
