Ontiveros v. Subia
| Ed Ontiveros |
| R J Subia and Attorney General for the State of California |
| 2:2007cv01441 |
| July 19, 2007 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Amador |
| John A. Mendez |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
72
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/23/15 RECOMMENDING that petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus be denied. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 03/16/15 ordering respondent's motion to dismiss 7 is deemed withdrawn. The evidentiary hearing set for 06/01/15 is vacated. Respondent shall file an answer within 10 days of the date of this order. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/29/15 ordering ( Evidentiary Hearing set for 6/1/2015 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd.) The evidentiary hearing will be limited to the issue of whether petiti oner is entitled to equitable tolling of the statute of limitations. The court will issue a separate order and writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum for petitioner's attendance at the evidentiary hearing approximately 6 weeks prior to the hearing date. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/09/14 ordering that within 14 days of the filing and service of this order petitioner's counsel shall clearly specify whether petitioner still seeks and evidentiary hearing on the sole issue of equitable tolling. (See order for further details)(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER adopting 47 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 4/1/13: Claims I, III and IV of petitioner's habeas petition are summarily dismissed. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/1/12 ORDERING that petitioner shall file and serve a supplemental brief, along with any additional evidence or proffer in support of his argument for equitable t olling within 21 days of the date of this order; Respondent shall file and serve a response to petitioners supplemental brief on equitable tolling within 14 days of being served with petitioners supplemental brief; and Petitioner may file and s erve a reply brief in response to respondents supplemental brief in response within 7 days of being served with respondents supplemental brief if he deems it warranted. It is RECOMMENDED that Claims I, III and IV of petitioners habeas petition be summarily dismissed. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 21 days.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/25/2011 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 45 are ADOPTED in FULL; and Respondent's 7 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
45
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 02/07/11 recommending that respondent's 04/02/08 motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust 7 be denied. MOTION to DISMISS 7 referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 05/04/10 granting 32 Motion for briefing schedule. Petitioner shall file within 28 days of the date of this order, any opposition to respondent's motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust. Respondent's reply, if any, shall be filed and served within 14 days after service of the opposition. The matter will be set for hearing, if deemed appropriate by the court, after the submission of the briefing. (Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
