Dean v. Carey et al
| Eric Dean |
| Thomas Carey and Attorney General for the State of California |
| 2:2007cv01531 |
| July 27, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Solano |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| William B. Shubb |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
ORDER signed by Circuit Judge M. Margaret McKeown on 7/25/12 ORDERING that in accord with the Ninth Circuit's order dated 4/20/11, this case is dismissed with prejudice as moot. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER signed by Circuit Judge M. Margaret McKeown on 11/22/10 DENYING 24 Motion to Stay. (Manzer, C)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER signed by Circuit Judge M. Margaret McKeown on 10/4/10 ORDERING that the petition for writ of habeas corpus is GRANTED; w/i 60 days of service of this order, the California Board of Parole Hearings must convene a new parole hearing for Dean and determine his eligibility for parole based on the Court's determinations set forth in this Order; and the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of Dean. CASE CLOSED. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/2/07 ORDERING that within 30 days Ptnr shall submit an affidavit in support of his request to proceed IFP or the appropriate filing fee. The Clerk is directed to send Ptnr an IFP application. (Engbretson, K.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
