Carey v. Sisto et al
Richard H. Carey |
D. K. Sisto and Attorney General of the State of California |
2:2007cv01642 |
August 13, 2007 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Solano |
Morrison C. England |
Kimberly J. Mueller |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 34 ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 7/13/2010 re 30 ORDERING that petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and a certificate of appealability shall not issue in this case.(Duong, D) |
Filing 22 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Charlene H. Sorrentino on 9/1/2009 ORDERING that Respondent lodge a complete copy of the transcripts of the 3/9/2006, parole hearing within 21 days of the date of this order. (Reader, L) |
Filing 14 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 02/06/09 recommending that respondent's motion to dismiss be granted as to claim 4 but denied as to claims 1 through 3 of the petition. Motion 10 referred to Judge Morrison C. England. Objections due within 20 days. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 8 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/7/08: Respondent is hereby GRANTED an extension of time of thirty days, up to and including March 5, 2008, in which to file a response to the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 7 .(Kaminski, H) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.