Watson v. Sisto, et al
| Nyles Lawayne Watson |
| D. K. Sisto, Traquina, Richard Tan, Jason Rohrer, A. Noriega and Naku |
| 2:2007cv01871 |
| September 10, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Solano |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| Lawrence K. Karlton |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
116
ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/28/2011 ORDERING that Gary Swarthout is SUBSTITUED for former CSP-S Warden D.K. Sisto, as a dft herein, named in his official capacity only; pltf's 110 r equest for judicial notice is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; dfts' 106 request for judicial notice is GRANTED; dfts' 113 objections to pltf's evidence are SUSTAINED in part and OVERRULED in part; pltf's 112 objections t o dfts' evidence are OVERRULED; and RECOMMENDING that dfts' 106 motion for summary judgment be granted on each of pltf's claims, and that judgment be entered for dfts. Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton; Objections due w/in 14 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
105
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 07/25/11 ordering (Dispositive Motions due by 8/26/2011). (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
99
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/31/2011 and agreed between the parties establishing that Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 4/15/2011, Expert Reports due 5/16/2011, Designation of Rebuttal Experts due 6/29/2011, Expert Discovery Closed on 7/14/2011, and Dispositive Motions to be filed by 8/12/2011. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
98
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 3/29/2011 ORDERING that The 96 findings and recommendations filed February 14, 2011, areadopted in full. Defendants' 66 motion to dismiss plaintiff's First Amended Plaintiff's cl aims made pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act and Rehabilitation Act are DISMISSED. Defendants California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and California State Prison-Solano are DISMISSED. This action shall proceed on plaintiffs First and Eighth Amendment claims pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, against defendants Traquina, Tan, Rohrer and Sisto, as set forth in the findings and recommendations. (Duong, D)
|
|
Filing
96
AMENDED ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 02/11/11 ORDERING that plaintiff's motion to strike defendants' evidence 76 is granted. Also, RECOMMENDING that defendants' motion to dis miss 66 plaintiff's first amended complaint should be granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff's claims made pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act and Rehabilitation Act should be dismissed. Defendants California Departme nt of Corrections and Rehabilitation and California State Prison Solano should be dismissed. This action should proceed on plaintiff's First and Eighth Amendment claims pursuant to 42 USC 1983 against defendants Traquina, Tan, Rohrer and Sisto as set forth herein. Amended Complaint 65 and MOTION to DISMISS 66 referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Objections due within 14 days.(Plummer, M) Modified on 2/14/2011 (Plummer, M).
|
|
Filing
94
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/22/10 vacating 92 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Amended findings and recommendations will be filed in due course.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
92
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/1/10 ORDERING that 76 Motion to Strike defendants' evidence is GRANTED; RECOMMNEDING that 66 MOTION to DISMISS be granted in part and denied in part. Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
90
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 2/2/2010 ORDERING 89 that the deadline to file pretrial motions is removed from the Court's calendar on 2/12/2010. The parties further agree to hold a meet and confer session, within 30 days of receipt of the Court's Order on defendant's motion to dismiss. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
88
SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 01/19/10 ordering plaintiff will no longer be represented by attorney James P. Baker. Plaintiff will be represented by Caroline N. Mitchell in this matter. Matthew J. Silveira will reamin as an attorney of record for plaintiff in this action. (Plummer, M) Modified on 1/26/2010 (Plummer, M).
|
|
Filing
85
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/27/09 ordering the parties agree to a 60 day extension of the remaining deadlines in this case, whereby the parties will have until 02/12/10 to file all pretrial motions (including dispositive pretrial motions) other than motions to compel and motions in limine.(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
79
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 07/28/09 ordering the hearing of the CDCR defendants' motion to dismiss 67 is continued to 08/13/09 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom 24. (Plummer, M) Modified on 7/28/2009 (Plummer, M).
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 7/13/09 ORDERING that dfts' 72 motion for leave to take pltf's depo is VACATED as unecessary; and so long as pltf's depo is noticed in accordance w/ the 14 Discovery Order, it will proceed w/ no further order from this court. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 01/15/2009 GRANTING 49 Joint Status Conference Scheduling Request. Status Conference set for 2/12/2009 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (GGH) before Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows.(Streeter, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
