Connally v. Sisto et al
| Patrick Eugene Connally |
| D. K. Sisto and Attorney General for the State of California |
| 2:2007cv02134 |
| October 10, 2007 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Solano |
| Frank C. Damrell |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Circuit Judge Mary M. Schroeder on 2/28/11: Petitioner is directed to show cause within thirty (30) days of the date of this order, why this court should not summarily dismiss the petition in light of the Supreme Court's recent decision. In the event no response is filed, the Petition will be dismissed.(Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Circuit Judge Mary M. Schroeder on 9/2/2010 ORDERING that Ptnr is directed to SHOW CAUSE within 30 days why Resp's motion to dismiss should not be granted. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER signed by Circuit Judge Mary M. Schroeder on 6/1/2010 ORDERING that the parties are directed to file simultaneous memoranda within thirty (30) days of this order on the applicability of Hayward to the pending petition. Briefs shall not exceed 2,000 words.(Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Circuit Judge Mary M. Schroeder on 4/7/2009 ORDERING that this action is STAYED pending final disposition of Hayward v. Marshall. (Gaydosh, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
