Baker v. Hatch
Robert Guy Baker |
- Hatch |
2:2007cv02204 |
October 17, 2007 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Sacramento |
Edmund F. Brennan |
Frank C. Damrell |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 100 ORDER and WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM ISSUED signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/7/13 ORDERING the Custodian to produce Robert Guy Baker at 1:30 pm on April 19, 2013 in Courtroom 10. Custodian is ordered to notify the Court of any changes in custody and to provide new custodian with a copy of this writ. Clerk shall serve a copy of this order and writ on the Custodian and Out-to-Court Desk. (cc: OTCD)(Dillon, M) |
Filing 99 ORDER and WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM ISSUED signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 03/05/13 ordering the custodian to produce Robert Guy Baker via video conferencing at 04/19/13 at 1:30 p.m. in courtroom 10 before Judge Garland E. Burrell. Custodian is ordered to notify the court of any changes in custody and to provide new custodian with a copy of this writ. Clerk shall serve a copy of this order and writ on the custodian. (cc: I.T. Dept, Sacramento) (Plummer, M) |
Filing 96 SECOND AMENDED PRETRIAL ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/09/12 ordering a trail confirmation hearing is set for 04/19/13 at 1:30 p.m. in courtroom 10 before District Judge Garland E. Burrell. Jury trial is set for 06/04/13 at 9:00 a.m. in courtroom 10 before District Judge Garland E. Burrell. (See order for further details) (Plummer, M) |
Filing 85 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/18/2012 ORDERING 82 Motion to Appoint Counsel is DENIED. (Waggoner, D) |
Filing 81 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/23/12 DENYING 79 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Dillon, M) |
Filing 75 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/30/12 ORDERING that within 30 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file and serve a pretrial statement and any motions necessary to obtain the attendance of witnesses at trial. Defen dant shall file a pretrial statement not later than 30 days after the filing of plaintiffs statement. Pretrial conference (as described in Local Rule 282) will be conducted on the file only, without appearance by either party. The date for jury trial before the assigned district judge will be set in the pretrial order. (Dillon, M) |
Filing 74 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 04/04/12 ordering the parties to this action shall each no later than 21 days from the date of the order submit confidential statements as described below. (See order for further details)(cc: ADR Director)(Plummer, M) |
Filing 73 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 3/20/2012 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 71 are ADOPTED in FULL; and Defendant Hatch's renewed motion for summary judgment # 32 , 57 is DENIED. (Reader, L) |
Filing 71 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 02/23/12 recommending that defendant Hatch's renewed motion for summary judgment 32 , 57 be denied. Motions 32 , 57 referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 70 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/5/11 DENYING 56 Motion. (Dillon, M) |
Filing 67 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/26/11 GRANTING 63 Motion to Seal; Clerk is directed to strike plaintiffs opposition to defendants motion for summary judgment from the docket and file a redacted version with pages 5-8 separately filed under seal. (Dillon, M) |
Filing 55 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 06/20/11 DENYING 53 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Michel, G) |
Filing 52 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 06/03/11 ordering within 14 days of the date of this order, defendant shall either produce document sets 1a-c, 2 and 6a-b to plaintiff or arrange for plaintiff to review the documents at a reasona ble place and for a period of time not less than 3 hours. Plaintiff shall be allowed to take notes during the review. Plaintiff shall not make copies of the documents. Plaintiff shall not disclose any information from the documents to anyone excep t for the purposes of this litigation. Within 30 days of the date of this order, defendant may re-notice his motion for summary judgment or file an amended motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff may re-file his previous opposition or file an amended opposition within 21 days after that. Defendant may file his reply within 14 days after that. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 51 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/20/2010 DENYING pltf's 49 motion for the appointment of counsel. (Yin, K) |
Filing 44 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 08/12/10 ordering plaintiff's 02/05/09 motion to compel discovery 26 is partially granted and partially denied. Defendant shall either produce documents responsive to plaintiff's RFP 4 or submit a declaration stating that the documents sought do not exist, and shall either produce documents responsive to RFP 7 or produce a privilege log and submit the allegedly privileged documents to the court for in camera review within 20 days of the date of this order. Plaintiff's 02/26/10 motion for order for examination 38 is denied. Plaintiff's 02/26/10 motion for sanctions 39 is denied. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 34 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/2/10 ORDERING that 22 Motion for an order compelling CSP-SAC warden not to delay plaintiffs mail is DENIED; 23 Motion to compel is DENIED; Defendant is ordered to file an opposition or a statement of no opposition to plaintiffs 2/5/09 discovery motion within 21 days of this order. Defendant's 32 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED without prejudice. (Dillon, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Baker v. Hatch | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Robert Guy Baker | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: - Hatch | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.