Tafoya v. Subia
Raymond Joel Tafoya |
R. J. Subia |
2:2007cv02389 |
November 1, 2007 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Amador |
Edmund F. Brennan |
Garland E. Burrell |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 33 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Bommer on 9/9/10 RECOMMENDING that Petitioner's Application for a writ of habeas corpus 1 be denied; REFERRED to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; objections may be filed within 21 days after being served with these F&R's.(Carlos, K) |
Filing 29 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/4/2010 GRANTING 28 Respondent's Request for extention of time; Respondent shall file an answer to the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus due by 6/1/2010. (Reader, L) |
Filing 27 ORDER adopting 24 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/29/10: 19 Motion to Dismiss is denied. Respondent shall answer the petition within thirty days after the filing date of this order. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 24 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 02/22/10 recommending that respondent's 07/27/09 motion to dismiss 19 be denied. The clerk of the court be directed to send petitioner a copy of page 8 of the 11/01/ 07 petition. Within 21 days from the date of any order adopting these findings and recommendations, petitioner shall file a signed and date page 8 for interlineation into the court record or he may file a separate verification form, so long as it is signed and dated and verifies the accuracy of the 11/01/07 petition. Respondent be directed to answer the petition within 30 day from the date petitioner provides the signed verification, and shall include with the answer any and all transcripts or other documents relevant to the determination of the issues presented in the application that are not already part of the record. Petitioner's reply, if any, be due on or before 30 days from the date respondents' answer is filed. Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 1 and motion to dismiss 19 referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 17 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 01/23/09 ordering that petitioner's 10/31/08 request for appointment of counsel 16 is denied without prejudice. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 3 ORDER, INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER to SACRAMENTO. New Case number 2:07-cv-2389-GEB-EFB, signed by Judge Gary S. Austin on 11/6/2007. (Scrivner, E) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Tafoya v. Subia | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Raymond Joel Tafoya | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: R. J. Subia | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.