Lancaster v. Carey et al
| David Gene Lancaster |
| Tom L. Carey, J.A. Nuehring, N. - Fry, - Terrazas, O. Y. Crewford, J.L. Herrera and Attorney General of the State of California |
| 2:2008cv00051 |
| January 9, 2008 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Monterey |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| Lawrence K. Karlton |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 11/5/12 re 65 MOTION for stay or dismissal of this action filed by N. - Fry, David Gene Lancaster, J.L. Herrera; The court is in receipt of the parties' joint notification of conditional settlement and motion for stay or dismissal of the action. Pursuant to the parties' joint request, the court dismisses the action, without prejudice to renew in the event that the Governor's Office reverses Plaintiff's grant of parole. Civil Case Terminated. CASE CLOSED. (Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
64
FURTHER SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/24/2012: Plaintiff's pretrial statement and any motions to obtain trial witnesses due on or before 1/4/2013, Defendants' pretrial statement due on or before 1/18/2 013; Pretrial Conference is SET for 1/25/2013 before Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows (to be conducted on the file only); Trial Confirmation Hearing is SET for 4/22/2013 at 11:15 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Judge Lawrence K. Karlton (plaintiff to appear via video-conferencing); and the Jury Trial is SET for 7/30/2013 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 12/02/11 ordering the court hereby vacates the pretrial conference, trial confirmation hearing and trial dates as set forth in the 07/26/11 further scheduling order. Plaintiff's motion for obtaining an investigator 58 is also vacated. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 08/02/11 ordering the parties to this action shall each, no later than 14 days from the date of the order, submit confidential statements as described below. The confidential statements shall no t be served on the opposing party or filed with the court, but instead delivered by mail, fax, email or personal delivery to the court's Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) division at the address, fax number or email address below and marked "Confidential". Such statements shall be limited 5 pages. (See order for further details) (cc: ADR Director)(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER adopting 50 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 7/19/11: Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted as to defendant Carey and denied as to defendants Herrera and Fry 38 . (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 7/6/11 DENYING 53 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
50
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 6/6/11 RECOMMENDING that 38 Motion for Summary Judgment be granted as to defendant Carey and denied as to defendants Herrera and Fry. Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 11/1/10 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court is to re-designate this action in the case docket as one brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983; and Plaintiffs premature filings at docket #s 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 and 36 are vacated without prejudice to their being filed at an appropriate time. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 7/20/2010 GRANTING dfts' 28 request to take pltf's depo via videoconference. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER signed by District Judge Samuel P. King on 12/15/2009 DENYING 20 Plaintiff's Request for Appointment of Counsel. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER DIRECTING USM to serve * Complaint * filed on * 9/2/08,* on * Tom L. Carey, N. - Fry, J.L. Herrera*, within 10 days signed by District Judge Samuel P. King on 8/27/09. The Clerk is directed to forward the instructions for service of process, the completed summons, copies of the complaint and copies of this order to the USM. The Clerk shall serve upon pltf a copy of the Local Rules of Court. (cc: USM) (Engbretson, K.)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT IN PART, GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND AND AUTHORIZING SERVICE OF PROCESS signed by District Judge Samuel P. King on 7/20/09 ORDERING that The Clerk of the Court shall send Plaintiff a copy of this order, three USM-285 forms, a s ummons, an instruction sheet, and a copy of the complaint filed on September 2, 2008. Within 30 days from the date of this order, Plaintiff shall EITHER complete requirements for service of the current complaint, OR file a further Amended Complaint (which will then be subject to additional screening). Plaintiff may not do both. If Plaintiff chooses to amend the complaint, service is not yet authorized. Plaintiff should await screening of the amended complaint and obtain permission from the court before proceeding with submission of the documents required for service. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this order within 30 days may result in dismissal of the action. Case Management Deadline: 8/24/2009. (Duong, D)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
