Haff v. People of The State of California et al
| Matthew David Haff |
| People of The State of California and Attorney General for the State of California |
| 2:2008cv00294 |
| February 7, 2008 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Lassen |
| Morrison C. England |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 8/7/09 ORDERING that the 21 findings and recommendations filed July 10, 2009, are adopted in full. Respondent's 5 motion to dismiss, filed on April 3, 2008, is GRANTED. This case is DISMISSED. CASE CLOSED. (Duong, D)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 7/10/09 ORDERING that the record is expanded to include the declarations and documents discussed in this motion; RECOMMENDING that 5 Motion to Dismiss be granted and this case be dismissed. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Objections to F&R due within 20 days.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 4/3/09 ORDERING that the FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS filed 12/15/08 12 are remanded back to the Magistrate Judge. Petitioner is GRANTED 10 days from service of this order to respond with evidence to Respondent's Objections. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
