Sprinkler Fitters Local Union 669 v. Pro-Tech Fire Protection Systems
| Sprinkler Fitters Local Union 669, Brad Conrado, Dean Jensen and Thomas Caudle |
| Pro-Tech Fire Protection Systems, Corp. |
| 2:2008cv00643 |
| March 21, 2008 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Ronald S.W. Lew |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 7/14/09 ORDERING this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1). CASE CLOSED. (Carlos, K)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/14/09 ORDERING that Plaintiffs' MOTION for an order shortening time 26 is DENIED; however, the motion shall be construed as Plaintiffs notice of motion to compel discovery, and is hereby scheduled for hearing on 5/6/09. The joint statement on Defendant's Motion to compel 19 , set for hearing on 4/22/09, shall be filed no later than 12:00 p.m., noon, 4/17/09.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
28
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 04/06/09 ORDERING that the Discovery cutoff off date is CONTINUED to 05/29/09. The parties shall file with the Court a brief joint mid-litigation statement no later than 14 days prior to 05/29/09. (Benson, A.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
