de Vries v. Schwarzenegger, et al
Petitioner: Michael F. de Vries
Respondent: Claude E. Finn, Arnold Schwarzenegger and Attorney General of the State of California
Case Number: 2:2008cv00810
Filed: April 17, 2008
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: San Joaquin
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Drozd
Presiding Judge: William B. Shubb
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 7/14/2011. Petitioner's 18 Motion to Appoint Counsel and 1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus are both DENIED. Court is DECLINING to issue Certificate of Appealability. Clerk to enter Judgment accordingly. (Marciel, M)
September 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 9/1/10 ORDERING that the Motion to Stay Proceedings 15 is GRANTED; de Vries is directed to inform this Court of the Governor's action, if any, on the grant of parole on or before 10/1/10; unless this matter is sooner dismissed, the time for filing the supplemental Briefs ordered by this Court on 7/7/10, is hereby extended to 11/1/10. (Becknal, R)
July 7, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 7/6/2010 ORDERING that on or before 8/6/2010, each party must file a brief setting forth the party's position on the impact of Hayward on this case. (Zignago, K.)
February 6, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 2/6/09 ORDERING that further proceedings in this matter are STAYED pending the issuance of the mandate by the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Hayward v. Marshall, 512 F.3d 536, rehg en b anc granted, 527 F.3d 797 (9th Cir. 2008), Case No. 06-55392. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT, should the Petitioner be granted parole, not later than 30 days after the decision of the Board of Parole Hearings becomes effective, Respondent is directed to inform the Court of the action of the Board and the date Petitioner is scheduled to be released on parole. (Carlos, K) Modified on 2/6/2009 (Carlos, K).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: de Vries v. Schwarzenegger, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Michael F. de Vries
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Claude E. Finn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Arnold Schwarzenegger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?