Brooks v. Sisto, et al
| Gordon Brooks |
| D. K. Sisto and Attorney General of the State of California |
| 2:2008cv00862 |
| April 23, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
| Solano |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Morrison C. England |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Charlene H. Sorrentino on 1/21/2011 ORDERING that petitioner's 28 January 14, 2011 motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied at this time, without prejudice to its renewal upon submission of petitioner's trust fund account statement.(Duong, D)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Charlene H. Sorrentino on 10/18/10 ORDERING petitioner's request for extension of time 20 is GRANTED and petitioner has until 11/16/10 in which to file objections to the findings and recommendations. (Carlos, K)
|
|
Filing
19
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Charlene H. Sorrentino on 9/21/10, RECOMMENDING that the petition for writ of hc be DENIED. Case referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Within 21 days after being served with these f&r's, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. (Kastilahn, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
