Franklin v. Walker
Petitioner: Timothy Prince Franklin
Respondent: James Walker
Case Number: 2:2008cv01276
Filed: June 6, 2008
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Kimberly J. Mueller
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 14, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Charlene H. Sorrentino on 4/13/10 ORDERING petitioner's 4/2/10 application to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal 29 DENIED as unnecessary. (Carlos, K)
February 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 2/22/10 issuing CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY solely as to petitioner's unconstitutional sentencing claim re 25 Notice of Appeal. (Owen, K)
February 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 2/1/10 ORDERING the Findings and Recommendations 21 are ADOPTED IN FULL; and Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. CASE CLOSED. (Carlos, K)
December 28, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 21 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Charlene H. Sorrentino on 12/28/09 RECOMMENDING that petitioner's 1 application for writ of habeas corpus be DENIED; Objections to these F&Rs due w/i 20 days; referred to Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. (Benson, A.)
December 18, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER denying 19 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Charlene H. Sorrentino on 12/18/09. (Kaminski, H)
October 9, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii; Due to the appointment of Recalled Magistrate Judge Charlene H. Sorrentino to the bench of the Eastern District, this action is REASSIGNED from Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller to Magistrate Judge Charlene H. Sorrentino for all further proceedings. The District Judge currently assigned to the case will remain unchanged. (Donati, J)
February 6, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 02/05/09 ordering petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis 2 is granted. Respondents are directed to file a response to petitioner's habeas petition within 60 days from the date of this order. The clerk of the court shall serve a copy of this order together with a copy of the petition for writ of habeas corpus on Michael Farrell, Senior Assistant Attorney General. The clerk of the court is directed to assign a district judge to this case. District Judge Frank C. Damrell randomly assigned to this case. (cc: Michael Farrell)(Plummer, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Franklin v. Walker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Timothy Prince Franklin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: James Walker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?