Worden et al v. Philip Morris USA, Inc. et al
June M. Worden and Leonard R. Worden |
Philip Morris USA, Inc., R. J. Reynolds Tobacco, Co. and Altria Group, Inc. |
2:2008cv01558 |
July 7, 2008 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
P.I.: Other Office |
Sacramento |
Gregory G. Hollows |
John A. Mendez |
None |
Diversity |
28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 75 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/23/2015 DISMISSING with prejudice Defendant R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company. CASE CLOSED. (Donati, J) |
Filing 72 STIPULATION and ORDER 71 for Dismissal signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 2/20/2015. All claims against defendant Philip Morris USA, Inc. (and its parent company) are DISMISSED with prejudice. (Marciel, M) |
Filing 39 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 12/4/2009 ORDERING that the 13 Motion to Dismiss and to Strike is WITHDRAWN; motion hearing on 01/06/10 is VACATED; pltf's may file Second Amended Complaint by 01/04/10; dfts response due by 02/04/10. (Suttles, J) |
Filing 26 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 1/16/2009 ORDERING that both parties now appearing by counsel, the referral to the magistrate judge is withdrawn. However, the magistrate judge shall continue to perform all duties; All dates are vacated; and Defendants shall re-notice their motion to dismiss before the district judge.(Matson, R) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.