O'Campo v. Ghoman et al
Plaintiff: Dimas O'Campo
Defendant: Raghbir Singh Ghoman and Ghoman's Properties, LLC
Case Number: 2:2008cv01624
Filed: July 15, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Frank C. Damrell
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Drozd
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 31, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 102 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 7/28/17, RECOMMENDING that Plaintiff's 92 motion for default judgment be granted; Judgment be entered against the defendants; Defendants be ordered to pay $12,000 in statutory damages; Defendants be ordered to correct the violations at the Quick Shop identified in plaintiff's second amended complaint; Defendants be ordered to pay plaintiff $85,574 in attorneys fees; Defendants be ordered to pay plaintiff $1,387.24 in costs; and this case be closed. Matter REFERRED to District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Within 14 days after these findings and recommendations are filed, any party may file written objections with the court. (Kastilahn, A)
March 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 98 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 3/24/2017 ORDERING the plaintiff to comply with the 95 Order, within seven days of the hearing held on 3/24/2017, and file a document providing a comparison of the total hours expended, by each attorney and paralegal, before and after the Ninth Circuit's ruling on 11/9/2015. (Michel, G.)
February 16, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 95 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 2/16/17 ORDERING that the 2/17/17 hearing of Plaintiff's MOTION 92 for Default Judgment is CONTINUED to 3/24/2017 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DB) before Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes. On or before 3/10/17, Plaintiff shall file a supplemental memorandum.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
January 12, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 90 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 1/11/2017 ORDERING that plaintiff shall show cause in writing within 7 days of the date of this order as to why this action should not be dismissed for a lack of prosecution and why plaintiff's counsel should not be sanctioned for failing to comply with the 11/30/2016 order to show cause. (Reader, L)
November 30, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 87 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 11/29/16 ORDERING that plaintiff shall show cause in writing within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this order as to why this action should not be dismissed for a lack of prosecution. (Becknal, R)
May 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 82 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 5/18/2016 GRANTING 77 Motion to Amend the Complaint. The proposed second amended complaint filed 3/21/2016 is deemed the operative pleading. Within thirty days of the date of this order, plaint iff shall serve the second amended complaint on the defendants in full compliance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Fourteen days after plaintiff has served the defendants, plaintiff shall file a declaration setting forth plaintiff's efforts in locating the defendants and why plaintiff believes defendants have been served in compliance with Rule 4. (Zignago, K.)
January 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/8/2016. Plaintiff's 27 First Amended Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff may file Motion seeking leave to file an Amended Complaint within 28 days of date of Order. Clerk shall serve Order on defendants by mail at their last know address. (Marciel, M)
July 29, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/26/2013 DENYING 42 Motion for Summary Judgment; DISMISSING CASE, with prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Michel, G)
May 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/30/13 ORDERING that plaintiff has already served the motion on defendants by mail and received no response, the court denies this request. In light of defendants' lack of response, however, the hearing set for May 10, 2013 is vacated under Local Rules 230(c) and 230(g). (Becknal, R)
June 21, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 40 STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/20/12: Initial disclosures shall be completed BY 6/28/2012; all discovery shall be completed BY 1/31/2013; designation of expert witnesses is DUE by 11/30/2012; supplemental list of expert witnesses is DUE by 12/20/2012; all expert discovery shall be completed by 1/18/2013; all dispositive motions, except motions for continuances, temporary restraining orders or other emergency applications, shall be heard no later than 3/29/2013; the final pretrial conference is SET for 5/16/2012 at 03:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; the parties' joint pretrial conference statement is DUE by 4/25/2013; the trial is SET for 6/24/2013 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Case is referred to the Voluntary Dispute Resolution Panel (VDRP). The court's 34 Order to Show Cause is DISCHARGED; and the Clerk's 18 Entry of Default is VACATED. (Kastilahn, A)
May 15, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER and ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/15/12. The pretrial scheduling conference set for 5/17/12 is VACATED; and the parties are DIRECTED to show cause, within 10 days of the date of this order, why they should not be sanctioned $250.00 for failing to file a joint status report. (Meuleman, A)
March 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/29/12 ORDERING that this matter is referred back to the District Judge assigned to this action; All dates pending before the undersigned are vacated; A Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is set for Thursday, May 17, 2012, at 3:30 p.m., in Courtroom No. 3, before the Honorable Kimberly J. Mueller; The parties shall file a joint status report on or before Thursday, May 10, 2012. (Dillon, M)
January 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER adopting in full 25 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/26/12. Plaintiff's 19 Motion to Amend the Complaint is GRANTED; and plaintiff is GRANTED 21 days to file and serve his amended complaint. (Kastilahn, A)
November 10, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 25 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/9/2011 RECOMMENDING that plaintiff's # 19 motion to amend his complaint be granted; and plaintiff be granted 21 days to file and serve his amended complaint; Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections due within 14 days after being served with these F & R's. (Reader, L)
January 20, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/20/2011 ORDERING that the 19 MOTION to AMEND the 1 Complaint hearing is RESET for 2/25/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd and the hearing noticed before the assigned District Judge on the same date and time in Courtroom 2 is VACATED. Plaintiff's 20 Motion to continue dates is GRANTED-IN-PART, and the final Pretrial Conference set for 1/21/2011 at 1:30pm before the undersigned and the Jury Trial set for 3/29/11 at 9:00 am before the assigned district judge are VACATED. (Donati, J)
November 13, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER SETTING STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/13/09. A Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conf is SET for 2/5/2010 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd. All parties s hall appear at the Status Conf either in person or telephonically. To arrange telephonic appearance, the party shall contact Pete Buzo, the CRD for Judge Drozd no later than 48 hrs before the Status Conf. Pltf shall file and serve a status report on or before January 22, 2009, and dft Ghoman shall file and serve a status report on or before January 29, 2009. (Kastilahn, A)
November 12, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 11/10/2009 ADOPTING 11 Findings and Recommendations in full; dfts' 5 Answer is stricken to the extent of being filed on behalf of dft Ghomans Properties, LLC and is deemed to be solely the answer of dft Raghbir Singh Ghoman dba Quik Shop 2; Clerk shall modify 5 docket to reflect this order. (Suttles, J)
October 6, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 11 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/5/09 RECOMMENDING that Judge Damrell strike the answer filed 10/10/08 to the extent that it was filed on behalf of defendant Ghoman's Properties, LLC, and deem the answer to be solely the answer of defendant Raghbir Singh Ghoman dba Quik Shop 2. Referred to Judge Frank C. Damrell; Objections due within 15 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Becknal, R)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: O'Campo v. Ghoman et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dimas O'Campo
Represented By: Lynn Hubbard, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Raghbir Singh Ghoman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ghoman's Properties, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?